PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
8.43%
Positive revenue growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
10.14%
Positive gross profit growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
14.71%
Positive EBIT growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
14.71%
Positive operating income growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
20.85%
Net income growth of 20.85% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate into a larger gap.
20.00%
Positive EPS growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
19.05%
Positive diluted EPS growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
2.79%
Slight or no buybacks while AMD is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
1.07%
Slight or no buyback while AMD is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
21.21%
Dividend growth of 21.21% while AMD is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
57.42%
OCF growth under 50% of AMD's 480.30%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
59.52%
FCF growth under 50% of AMD's 959.38%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
155.66%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
152.06%
Positive 5Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
95.23%
Positive 3Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
223.58%
10Y OCF/share CAGR at 75-90% of AMD's 276.72%. Bill Ackman would demand strategic changes to close the gap in long-term cash generation.
94.19%
Below 50% of AMD's 202.98%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
84.97%
3Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of AMD's 162.06%. Martin Whitman would suspect weaker recent execution or product competitiveness.
314.22%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 102.07% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
524.18%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 109.92%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
358.31%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 113.30%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
196.87%
Positive growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
53.67%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
32.92%
Below 50% of AMD's 159.33%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
61.66%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 61.66% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-0.84%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
16.94%
We show growth while AMD is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
2.38%
Positive asset growth while AMD is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
5.29%
Under 50% of AMD's 23.79%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-7.52%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
5.63%
R&D growth of 5.63% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if the moderate investment leads to meaningful product differentiation.
2.92%
SG&A growth well above AMD's 1.52%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.