PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
10.17%
Positive revenue growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
14.83%
Positive gross profit growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
20.69%
Positive EBIT growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
20.69%
Positive operating income growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
11.27%
Positive net income growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
10.87%
Positive EPS growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
11.11%
Positive diluted EPS growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.16%
Reduced diluted shares while AMD is at 1.39%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.41%
Positive OCF growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
40.87%
Positive FCF growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
154.96%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
241.93%
Positive 5Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
152.42%
Positive 3Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
812.25%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 78.69%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
737.42%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 56.50%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
432.15%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
545.17%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 101.53% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
1525.76%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 133.33%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
741.04%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 107.14%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
158.52%
Below 50% of AMD's 529.17%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
62.83%
5Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x AMD's 45.79%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms if reinvested profits or buybacks explain the superior buildup.
53.45%
Below 50% of AMD's 272.97%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.21%
Dividend/share CAGR of 100.21% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
79.22%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 79.22% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-3.56%
Firm’s AR is declining while AMD shows 0.49%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
0.13%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. AMD's 13.02%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
1.95%
Asset growth well under 50% of AMD's 8.23%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
3.29%
Positive BV/share change while AMD is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.69%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. AMD's 0.54%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
5.00%
SG&A declining or stable vs. AMD's 23.19%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.