PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
13.15%
Revenue growth at 50-75% of AMD's 21.99%. Martin Whitman would worry about competitiveness or product relevance.
14.95%
Gross profit growth at 50-75% of AMD's 23.83%. Martin Whitman would question if cost structure or brand is lagging.
29.79%
Positive EBIT growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
29.79%
Positive operating income growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
31.23%
Positive net income growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
30.51%
Positive EPS growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
31.03%
Positive diluted EPS growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.32%
Share reduction more than 1.5x AMD's 14.07%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.16%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x AMD's 15.38%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
-0.32%
Dividend reduction while AMD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-9.34%
Negative OCF growth while AMD is at 21.05%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-11.66%
Negative FCF growth while AMD is at 25.54%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
463.61%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 94.23%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
275.12%
5Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x AMD's 193.74%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if cost efficiency or pricing power supports this advantage.
72.26%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of AMD's 427.58%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
942.36%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 386.30%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
424.44%
5Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x AMD's 295.60%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if capital spending or working-capital efficiencies explain the difference.
26.56%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of AMD's 632.51%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
1254.35%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 169.67% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
743.56%
Below 50% of AMD's 1500.00%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
49.99%
Below 50% of AMD's 5500.00%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
421.55%
Below 50% of AMD's 2650.62%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
286.90%
Below 50% of AMD's 7852.07%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
137.40%
Below 50% of AMD's 3427.79%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
38.08%
Dividend/share CAGR of 38.08% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
6.16%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 6.16% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
24.50%
AR growth well above AMD's 35.93%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
9.09%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. AMD's 24.35%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
6.96%
Asset growth well under 50% of AMD's 438.81%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
10.78%
Under 50% of AMD's 547.01%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
1.86%
Debt shrinking faster vs. AMD's 226.32%. David Dodd sees a safer balance sheet if it doesn't impair future growth.
0.52%
R&D dropping or stable vs. AMD's 30.70%. David Dodd sees near-term margin benefits if the product pipeline is already strong.
3.38%
SG&A declining or stable vs. AMD's 34.16%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.