PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
7.60%
Revenue growth above 1.5x AMD's 0.61%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
7.95%
Gross profit growth under 50% of AMD's 20.90%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
11.19%
Positive EBIT growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
11.19%
Positive operating income growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
21.88%
Positive net income growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
21.21%
Positive EPS growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
23.71%
Positive diluted EPS growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.20%
Slight or no buybacks while AMD is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
0.28%
Slight or no buyback while AMD is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
-0.20%
Dividend reduction while AMD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
99.67%
Positive OCF growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
112.63%
Positive FCF growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
683.17%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 123.01%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
210.71%
5Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x AMD's 149.98%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if cost efficiency or pricing power supports this advantage.
237.21%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 93.93%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
621.63%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 191.20%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
271.61%
Positive OCF/share growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
228.58%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
2428.00%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 102.04% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
305.01%
Positive 5Y CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
415.25%
Positive short-term CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
526.98%
Below 50% of AMD's 4581.63%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
308.00%
Below 50% of AMD's 5260.91%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
177.13%
Below 50% of AMD's 1326.82%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16.24%
Dividend/share CAGR of 16.24% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
-0.73%
Negative near-term dividend growth while AMD invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
17.60%
Our AR growth while AMD is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
16.66%
Inventory growth well above AMD's 11.93%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
8.75%
Positive asset growth while AMD is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
11.60%
BV/share growth above 1.5x AMD's 0.51%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.49%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. AMD's 6.80%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
1.08%
SG&A declining or stable vs. AMD's 5.92%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.