PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
2.02%
Revenue growth under 50% of AMD's 6.34%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
20.65%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x AMD's 5.72%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
108.99%
EBIT growth above 1.5x AMD's 38.16%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
108.99%
Operating income growth above 1.5x AMD's 52.68%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
107.94%
Net income growth at 75-90% of AMD's 123.08%. Bill Ackman would press for improvements to catch or surpass competitor performance.
111.11%
EPS growth at 75-90% of AMD's 127.78%. Bill Ackman would push for improved profitability or share repurchases to catch up.
111.11%
Diluted EPS growth at 75-90% of AMD's 127.78%. Bill Ackman would expect further improvements in net income or share count reduction.
-0.77%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-0.88%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
-1.24%
Dividend reduction while AMD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
473.72%
Positive OCF growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
1360.87%
Positive FCF growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
450.36%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 82.31%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
104.49%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of AMD's 169.52%. Martin Whitman would worry about a lagging mid-term growth trajectory.
93.61%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 44.49%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
402.03%
10Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of AMD's 752.13%. Martin Whitman might fear a structural deficiency in operational efficiency.
62.92%
Below 50% of AMD's 237.49%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
52.52%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
718.27%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 252.00% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
24.42%
Below 50% of AMD's 988.35%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
47.88%
Positive short-term CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
360.89%
Below 50% of AMD's 4725.61%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
191.02%
Below 50% of AMD's 2637.43%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
79.92%
Below 50% of AMD's 627.68%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
110.52%
Dividend/share CAGR of 110.52% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
5.94%
Dividend/share CAGR of 5.94% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
-0.65%
Negative near-term dividend growth while AMD invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
-22.03%
Firm’s AR is declining while AMD shows 6.53%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
15.83%
We show growth while AMD is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
1.71%
Asset growth above 1.5x AMD's 0.38%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
4.32%
Similar to AMD's 4.52%. Walter Schloss finds parallel capital usage or profit distribution strategies.
8.26%
Debt growth far above AMD's 4.93%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
0.36%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. AMD's 0.27%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
-0.95%
We cut SG&A while AMD invests at 11.81%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.