PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
87.81%
Revenue growth above 1.5x AMD's 6.61%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
103.57%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x AMD's 11.88%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
217.76%
EBIT growth 75-90% of AMD's 264.04%. Bill Ackman would push for cost reforms or better product mix to narrow the gap.
217.76%
Operating income growth under 50% of AMD's 647.22%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
202.89%
Net income growth above 1.5x AMD's 115.45%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
201.20%
EPS growth above 1.5x AMD's 100.00%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
204.88%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x AMD's 128.57%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
0.12%
Slight or no buybacks while AMD is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
0.36%
Slight or no buyback while AMD is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
0.89%
Dividend growth of 0.89% while AMD is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
118.07%
OCF growth above 1.5x AMD's 13.82%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
127.53%
FCF growth above 1.5x AMD's 15.83%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
1208.60%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 76.03%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
324.63%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 168.46%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
248.11%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 12.02%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
6130.13%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 1020.67%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
582.64%
Below 50% of AMD's 1292.37%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
303.63%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
5974.42%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 420.00% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
451.81%
5Y net income/share CAGR similar to AMD's 433.33%. Walter Schloss might see both on parallel mid-term trajectories.
891.23%
Positive short-term CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
524.07%
Below 50% of AMD's 4805.79%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
207.00%
Below 50% of AMD's 1994.98%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
96.93%
Below 50% of AMD's 491.47%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
118.44%
Dividend/share CAGR of 118.44% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
7.89%
Dividend/share CAGR of 7.89% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
0.64%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 0.64% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
73.19%
AR growth well above AMD's 13.89%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
-6.33%
Inventory is declining while AMD stands at 7.29%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
11.46%
Positive asset growth while AMD is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
12.02%
BV/share growth above 1.5x AMD's 6.73%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-9.32%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
8.80%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. AMD's 3.80%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
-1.74%
We cut SG&A while AMD invests at 7.08%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.