PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
17.83%
Positive revenue growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
21.53%
Positive gross profit growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
24.20%
Positive EBIT growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
24.20%
Positive operating income growth while AMD is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
21.13%
Net income growth under 50% of AMD's 47.10%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
20.00%
EPS growth under 50% of AMD's 46.67%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
22.45%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of AMD's 51.72%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
-0.16%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-0.04%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
-0.85%
Dividend reduction while AMD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
33.45%
Positive OCF growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
33.18%
Positive FCF growth while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
2045.22%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 246.36%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
1056.95%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 207.08%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
364.17%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 9.47%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
9129.58%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 360.33%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
2001.82%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 1165.19%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
726.15%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
9801.56%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 288.92% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
3624.74%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x AMD's 222.71%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
685.25%
Positive short-term CAGR while AMD is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
971.24%
Below 50% of AMD's 163202.77%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
399.42%
Below 50% of AMD's 1305.29%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
164.09%
Positive short-term equity growth while AMD is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
90.49%
Dividend/share CAGR of 90.49% while AMD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
-0.36%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while AMD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
-0.13%
Negative near-term dividend growth while AMD invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
23.66%
Our AR growth while AMD is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
11.02%
Inventory growth well above AMD's 11.89%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
17.26%
Asset growth above 1.5x AMD's 3.36%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
14.53%
BV/share growth above 1.5x AMD's 0.73%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-0.59%
We’re deleveraging while AMD stands at 113.88%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
10.34%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. AMD's 0.93%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
9.13%
SG&A growth well above AMD's 11.87%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.