176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
15.34%
Revenue growth above 1.5x AVGO's 0.59%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
10.62%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x AVGO's 0.51%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
10.25%
Positive EBIT growth while AVGO is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
10.25%
Positive operating income growth while AVGO is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
11.54%
Positive net income growth while AVGO is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
13.33%
Positive EPS growth while AVGO is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
11.67%
Positive diluted EPS growth while AVGO is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-0.17%
Share reduction while AVGO is at 0.26%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.17%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
151.45%
Dividend growth above 1.5x AVGO's 0.14%. David Dodd would verify if the firm's cash flow is robust enough for these payouts.
-5.58%
Negative OCF growth while AVGO is at 7.23%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-9.78%
Negative FCF growth while AVGO is at 6.62%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
2374.66%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AVGO's 409.54%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
1054.46%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AVGO's 122.61%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
368.27%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x AVGO's 60.90%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
13570.50%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x AVGO's 441.92%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
1434.13%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x AVGO's 73.80%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
447.93%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x AVGO's 34.25%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
11683.51%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x AVGO's 691.11% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
2880.39%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x AVGO's 651.30%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
609.21%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x AVGO's 66.58%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
1127.36%
10Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x AVGO's 839.21%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strong ROE or conservative payout policy fosters faster book value growth.
457.67%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x AVGO's 147.32%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
178.95%
3Y equity/share CAGR similar to AVGO's 188.08%. Walter Schloss sees both having parallel profitability or reinvestment over 3 years.
371.18%
Below 50% of AVGO's 1441.93%. Michael Burry might see weaker long-term distribution growth, raising questions about the firm's capital allocation.
148.79%
5Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x AVGO's 71.80%. David Dodd checks if the firm's mid-term cash flows justify a faster dividend growth rate.
149.52%
3Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x AVGO's 38.29%. David Dodd sees a superior short-term capital return strategy if supported by stable earnings.
14.29%
AR growth well above AVGO's 14.59%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
13.83%
Inventory growth well above AVGO's 5.71%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
10.58%
Positive asset growth while AVGO is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
18.55%
Positive BV/share change while AVGO is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-8.88%
We’re deleveraging while AVGO stands at 1.06%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
13.60%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. AVGO's 19.53%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
8.37%
SG&A growth well above AVGO's 14.12%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.