PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
32.37%
Positive revenue growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
30.96%
Positive gross profit growth while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
37.75%
Positive EBIT growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
37.75%
Positive operating income growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
37.74%
Positive net income growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
33.33%
Positive diluted EPS growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
27.59%
Share count expansion well above INTC's 0.15%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
6.33%
Slight or no buyback while INTC is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-49.52%
Negative OCF growth while INTC is at 12.15%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-32.08%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
19.15%
Our AR growth while INTC is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
221.37%
Inventory growth well above INTC's 15.75%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
28.36%
Positive asset growth while INTC is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-0.76%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-63.33%
We’re deleveraging while INTC stands at 14.69%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
24.19%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. INTC's 2.15%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
33.33%
SG&A growth well above INTC's 7.57%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.