PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
15.64%
Positive revenue growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
13.58%
Positive gross profit growth while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
22.90%
Positive EBIT growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
22.90%
Positive operating income growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
25.25%
Positive net income growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
50.00%
Positive EPS growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
25.00%
Positive diluted EPS growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-15.63%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
3.57%
Slight or no buyback while INTC is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.49%
Positive OCF growth while INTC is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
-11.81%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
93.17%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 477.06%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
93.17%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 50.60%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
93.17%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 8.63%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
188.68%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 513.71%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
188.68%
Positive OCF/share growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
188.68%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
168.12%
Net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x INTC's 140.54%. Bruce Berkowitz might see more effective use of capital or consistently better margins over time.
168.12%
Positive 5Y CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
168.12%
Positive short-term CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
95.63%
Below 50% of INTC's 840.94%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
95.63%
Below 50% of INTC's 199.75%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
95.63%
3Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x INTC's 66.99%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms timely buybacks or margin improvements drive stronger near-term equity growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.14%
Our AR growth while INTC is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
46.92%
Inventory growth well above INTC's 18.34%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
121.35%
Positive asset growth while INTC is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
54.53%
Positive BV/share change while INTC is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-24.33%
We’re deleveraging while INTC stands at 9.03%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
15.78%
We increase R&D while INTC cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
-2.31%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.