PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
14.76%
Positive revenue growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
14.50%
Positive gross profit growth while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
13.53%
Positive EBIT growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
13.53%
Positive operating income growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
23.16%
Positive net income growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
-41.67%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-40.00%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
103.97%
Share count expansion well above INTC's 0.06%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
104.39%
Slight or no buyback while INTC is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
126.49%
OCF growth above 1.5x INTC's 79.42%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
418.36%
FCF growth above 1.5x INTC's 98.31%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
-5.67%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while INTC stands at 333.82%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-5.67%
Negative 5Y CAGR while INTC stands at 44.79%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-5.67%
Negative 3Y CAGR while INTC stands at 7.49%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
414.93%
10Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x INTC's 323.40%. Bruce Berkowitz would confirm if the firm's long-term capital allocation yields better cash returns.
414.93%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 0.06%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
414.93%
3Y OCF/share CAGR similar to INTC's 427.55%. Walter Schloss might see both benefiting from a rising tide or parallel expansions.
45.15%
Positive 10Y CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
45.15%
Positive 5Y CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
45.15%
Positive short-term CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
7.87%
Below 50% of INTC's 666.67%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
7.87%
Below 50% of INTC's 179.52%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
7.87%
Below 50% of INTC's 70.02%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
18.19%
Our AR growth while INTC is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
23.34%
Inventory growth well above INTC's 6.56%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
13.26%
Positive asset growth while INTC is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-37.80%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-28.87%
We’re deleveraging while INTC stands at 13.19%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
12.96%
We increase R&D while INTC cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
20.55%
SG&A growth well above INTC's 1.65%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.