PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
16.30%
Revenue growth above 1.5x INTC's 3.33%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
16.08%
Positive gross profit growth while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
26.27%
EBIT growth below 50% of INTC's 79.26%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
26.27%
Operating income growth under 50% of INTC's 79.26%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
24.62%
Positive net income growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
157.14%
Positive EPS growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
150.00%
Positive diluted EPS growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-48.95%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-49.43%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-26.53%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-32.27%
Negative FCF growth while INTC is at 2876.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
82.27%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 451.50%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
82.27%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 34.14%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
82.27%
Positive 3Y CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
50.24%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 528.24%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
50.24%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 30.41%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
50.24%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
136.25%
Positive 10Y CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
136.25%
Positive 5Y CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
136.25%
Positive short-term CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
227.76%
Below 50% of INTC's 727.00%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
227.76%
5Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x INTC's 152.85%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms if reinvested profits or buybacks explain the superior buildup.
227.76%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 64.50%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
22.63%
AR growth well above INTC's 4.79%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
36.78%
We show growth while INTC is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
93.88%
Positive asset growth while INTC is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
243.60%
Positive BV/share change while INTC is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
16866.72%
We have some new debt while INTC reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
9.34%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. INTC's 1.20%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
1.71%
We expand SG&A while INTC cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.