PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
10.12%
Revenue growth above 1.5x INTC's 6.69%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
12.17%
Gross profit growth at 50-75% of INTC's 19.69%. Martin Whitman would question if cost structure or brand is lagging.
6.58%
EBIT growth below 50% of INTC's 159.13%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
6.58%
Operating income growth under 50% of INTC's 159.13%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
10.66%
Net income growth under 50% of INTC's 375.47%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
-11.11%
Negative EPS growth while INTC is at 250.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
6.67%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of INTC's 250.00%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
22.61%
Share count expansion well above INTC's 1.99%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.61%
Slight or no buyback while INTC is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-12.14%
Negative OCF growth while INTC is at 60.03%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-92.82%
Negative FCF growth while INTC is at 211.10%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
57.80%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 468.43%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
57.80%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 20.90%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
57.80%
Positive 3Y CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
172.15%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 700.87%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
172.15%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 12.80%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
172.15%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
97.53%
Net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 162.08%. Martin Whitman might question if the firm’s product or cost base lags behind.
97.53%
Positive 5Y CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
97.53%
Positive short-term CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
202.33%
Below 50% of INTC's 695.79%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
202.33%
5Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x INTC's 136.79%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms if reinvested profits or buybacks explain the superior buildup.
202.33%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 57.39%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.61%
Our AR growth while INTC is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
-3.53%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
3.36%
Asset growth above 1.5x INTC's 0.37%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
-8.46%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-0.12%
We’re deleveraging while INTC stands at 14.52%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
20.07%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. INTC's 2.37%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
13.57%
SG&A growth well above INTC's 0.66%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.