PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
10.41%
Positive revenue growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
11.96%
Positive gross profit growth while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
-19.51%
Negative EBIT growth while INTC is at 30.46%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-19.51%
Negative operating income growth while INTC is at 30.46%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-16.72%
Negative net income growth while INTC stands at 85.71%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-18.75%
Negative diluted EPS growth while INTC is at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-14.34%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
2.39%
Diluted share count expanding well above INTC's 0.13%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
129.66%
Positive OCF growth while INTC is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
392.13%
Positive FCF growth while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
186.63%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 401.55%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
186.63%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 3.09%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
186.63%
Positive 3Y CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
786.36%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 435.45%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
786.36%
Positive OCF/share growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
786.36%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
246.81%
Net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 366.79%. Martin Whitman might question if the firm’s product or cost base lags behind.
246.81%
Positive 5Y CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
246.81%
Positive short-term CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
410.21%
10Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 602.34%. Martin Whitman would note a lag in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
410.21%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 105.47%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
410.21%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 44.25%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-17.49%
Firm’s AR is declining while INTC shows 10.59%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-3.49%
Inventory is declining while INTC stands at 10.08%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
6.43%
Positive asset growth while INTC is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
33.31%
BV/share growth above 1.5x INTC's 2.60%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-0.08%
We’re deleveraging while INTC stands at 1.17%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
18.01%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. INTC's 3.15%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
11.29%
SG&A growth well above INTC's 0.09%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.