PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
8.02%
Positive revenue growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
5.99%
Positive gross profit growth while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
44.10%
Positive EBIT growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
44.10%
Positive operating income growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
29.80%
Positive net income growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
25.00%
Positive EPS growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
23.08%
Positive diluted EPS growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
2.33%
Slight or no buybacks while INTC is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
2.77%
Slight or no buyback while INTC is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
62.89%
OCF growth above 1.5x INTC's 10.54%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
770.89%
FCF growth above 1.5x INTC's 485.71%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
162.62%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 282.22%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm’s offerings lag behind the competitor.
162.62%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 3.85%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
162.62%
Positive 3Y CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
1486.11%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 315.87%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
1486.11%
Positive OCF/share growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
1486.11%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 16.13%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
294.43%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 66.99% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
294.43%
Positive 5Y CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
294.43%
Positive short-term CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
403.32%
10Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of INTC's 504.22%. Bill Ackman would push for either higher ROE or more earnings retention to catch the competitor.
403.32%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 100.22%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
403.32%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 38.49%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
30.26%
AR growth well above INTC's 0.83%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
3.27%
Inventory growth well above INTC's 1.01%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
9.93%
Positive asset growth while INTC is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
11.28%
Positive BV/share change while INTC is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
1.65%
We have some new debt while INTC reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
8.31%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. INTC's 4.28%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
5.48%
We expand SG&A while INTC cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.