PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-26.70%
Negative revenue growth while INTC stands at 0.96%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-52.07%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-94.74%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-94.74%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-93.69%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-93.48%
Negative EPS growth while INTC is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-92.31%
Negative diluted EPS growth while INTC is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
1.07%
Slight or no buybacks while INTC is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
-7.56%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-98.63%
Negative OCF growth while INTC is at 54.91%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-198.48%
Negative FCF growth while INTC is at 128.31%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
301.46%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x INTC's 244.54%. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate brand strength or geographical expansion fueling growth.
301.46%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 19.21%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
301.46%
Positive 3Y CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
114.83%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 311.25%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
114.83%
Below 50% of INTC's 579.71%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
114.83%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
-42.53%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while INTC is at 69.66%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-42.53%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-42.53%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
684.85%
10Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x INTC's 496.62%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strong ROE or conservative payout policy fosters faster book value growth.
684.85%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 69.28%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
684.85%
Positive short-term equity growth while INTC is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-12.14%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
12.37%
We show growth while INTC is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
0.96%
Asset growth at 50-75% of INTC's 1.50%. Martin Whitman questions if the firm is lagging expansions or if the competitor invests more aggressively.
0.64%
75-90% of INTC's 0.73%. Bill Ackman advocates improvements in profitability or buybacks to keep pace in net worth growth.
1.51%
Debt shrinking faster vs. INTC's 6.30%. David Dodd sees a safer balance sheet if it doesn't impair future growth.
9.02%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. INTC's 0.98%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
-4.20%
We cut SG&A while INTC invests at 5.99%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.