176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.71%
Revenue growth under 50% of INTC's 14.92%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
8.96%
Gross profit growth under 50% of INTC's 31.43%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
-912.75%
Negative EBIT growth while INTC is at 80.56%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-912.75%
Negative operating income growth while INTC is at 80.56%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-1025.69%
Negative net income growth while INTC stands at 84.93%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-966.67%
Negative EPS growth while INTC is at 78.57%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-966.67%
Negative diluted EPS growth while INTC is at 78.57%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.68%
Slight or no buybacks while INTC is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
-9.15%
Reduced diluted shares while INTC is at 0.68%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
13562.28%
OCF growth above 1.5x INTC's 20.35%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
420.66%
FCF growth above 1.5x INTC's 22.60%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
240.58%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of INTC's 277.78%. Bill Ackman would press for new markets or product lines to narrow the gap.
240.58%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 19.82%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
240.58%
Positive 3Y CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
567.31%
10Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x INTC's 392.68%. Bruce Berkowitz would confirm if the firm's long-term capital allocation yields better cash returns.
567.31%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 9.85%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
567.31%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 9.12%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
-452.26%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while INTC is at 206.29%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-452.26%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while INTC is 9.43%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-452.26%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
586.03%
10Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x INTC's 475.52%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strong ROE or conservative payout policy fosters faster book value growth.
586.03%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 76.46%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
586.03%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 2.16%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.65%
AR growth well above INTC's 15.44%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
-28.14%
Inventory is declining while INTC stands at 3.39%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
0.90%
Asset growth well under 50% of INTC's 5.71%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
-1.15%
We have a declining book value while INTC shows 5.40%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-0.51%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
0.96%
R&D dropping or stable vs. INTC's 10.30%. David Dodd sees near-term margin benefits if the product pipeline is already strong.
7.76%
We expand SG&A while INTC cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.