PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-13.64%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-21.56%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-62.75%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-62.75%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-61.23%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-60.00%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-60.00%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-5.32%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
0.23%
Slight or no buyback while INTC is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-67.48%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-87.03%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
320.91%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x INTC's 231.96%. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate brand strength or geographical expansion fueling growth.
320.91%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 16.86%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
117.89%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 25.68%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
777.42%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 217.53%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
777.42%
Positive OCF/share growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
203.94%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 55.36%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
131.30%
Net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 206.00%. Martin Whitman might question if the firm’s product or cost base lags behind.
131.30%
Positive 5Y CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
-13.73%
Negative 3Y CAGR while INTC is 269.97%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
824.39%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 410.83%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
824.39%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 58.13%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
372.52%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 7.07%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.81%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. INTC's 13.99%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
14.30%
Inventory growth well above INTC's 11.00%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
4.36%
Positive asset growth while INTC is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
8.80%
BV/share growth above 1.5x INTC's 1.19%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-0.05%
We’re deleveraging while INTC stands at 5.43%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
3.38%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. INTC's 1.53%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
-56.97%
We cut SG&A while INTC invests at 0.53%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.