PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
13.53%
Positive revenue growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
2.69%
Positive gross profit growth while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
-6.51%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-6.51%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
22.30%
Net income growth above 1.5x INTC's 1.56%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
30.00%
EPS growth of 30.00% while INTC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can accelerate over time.
20.00%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x INTC's 3.85%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
0.92%
Slight or no buybacks while INTC is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
3.95%
Slight or no buyback while INTC is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-53.46%
Negative OCF growth while INTC is at 129.79%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-419.88%
Negative FCF growth while INTC is at 179.06%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
310.99%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x INTC's 215.04%. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate brand strength or geographical expansion fueling growth.
310.99%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 22.48%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
335.67%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 32.51%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
497.51%
10Y OCF/share CAGR in line with INTC's 485.29%. Walter Schloss would see both as similarly efficient over the decade.
497.51%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 189.37%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
26.22%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 100.05%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
151.32%
Net income/share CAGR at 75-90% of INTC's 197.65%. Bill Ackman would press for strategic moves to boost long-term earnings.
151.32%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 3.12%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
73.14%
Below 50% of INTC's 834.79%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
741.63%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 402.43%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
741.63%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 55.53%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
680.22%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 9.55%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
22.13%
Our AR growth while INTC is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
31.41%
Inventory growth well above INTC's 15.27%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
5.49%
Asset growth above 1.5x INTC's 3.36%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
2.70%
BV/share growth above 1.5x INTC's 1.75%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-0.11%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
10.64%
We increase R&D while INTC cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
-2.90%
We cut SG&A while INTC invests at 2.54%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.