PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
5.72%
Revenue growth similar to INTC's 5.24%. Walter Schloss would see if both companies share industry tailwinds.
3.20%
Positive gross profit growth while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
-37.64%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-37.64%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-73.68%
Negative net income growth while INTC stands at 8.48%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-76.92%
Negative EPS growth while INTC is at 11.11%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-75.00%
Negative diluted EPS growth while INTC is at 11.11%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.89%
Slight or no buybacks while INTC is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
-0.85%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-145.79%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
32.57%
Positive FCF growth while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
265.26%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x INTC's 222.29%. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate brand strength or geographical expansion fueling growth.
265.26%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 20.58%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
100.39%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 36.39%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
-159.80%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while INTC stands at 604.68%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-159.80%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-139.81%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while INTC stands at 62.24%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-56.29%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while INTC is at 215.04%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-56.29%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while INTC is 36.37%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-81.50%
Negative 3Y CAGR while INTC is 1794.86%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
647.93%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 359.61%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
647.93%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 36.53%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
128.20%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 12.11%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-17.02%
Firm’s AR is declining while INTC shows 2.61%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
19.72%
We show growth while INTC is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
-18.05%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
0.49%
BV/share growth above 1.5x INTC's 0.12%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-97.28%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
11.33%
We increase R&D while INTC cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
6.28%
We expand SG&A while INTC cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.