PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-0.05%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
7.69%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x INTC's 4.11%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
0.27%
EBIT growth below 50% of INTC's 4.55%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
0.27%
Operating income growth under 50% of INTC's 4.55%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
-11.66%
Negative net income growth while INTC stands at 2.59%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-15.38%
Negative EPS growth while INTC is at 6.06%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-23.08%
Negative diluted EPS growth while INTC is at 6.06%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
2.27%
Slight or no buybacks while INTC is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
10.51%
Slight or no buyback while INTC is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6579.03%
Positive OCF growth while INTC is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
422.34%
Positive FCF growth while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
371.01%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 197.89%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
371.01%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 26.98%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
64.33%
3Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x INTC's 49.72%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better product or regional expansions than the competitor.
1181.54%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 456.55%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
1181.54%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 23.16%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
44.58%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 164.53%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
140.14%
Net income/share CAGR at 75-90% of INTC's 175.17%. Bill Ackman would press for strategic moves to boost long-term earnings.
140.14%
Positive 5Y CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
-30.76%
Negative 3Y CAGR while INTC is 150.41%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
903.49%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 323.26%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
903.49%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 12.37%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
96.68%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 13.17%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.41%
AR growth well above INTC's 7.57%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
0.24%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. INTC's 7.13%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
4.21%
Positive asset growth while INTC is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
1.03%
Positive BV/share change while INTC is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-30.45%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
8.00%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. INTC's 4.28%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
11.34%
SG&A growth well above INTC's 3.02%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.