PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-3.36%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-5.87%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-84.09%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-84.09%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-76.02%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-72.73%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-70.00%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.65%
Slight or no buybacks while INTC is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
-0.59%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-146.99%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-206.14%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
292.53%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 174.10%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
292.53%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 21.46%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
49.47%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of INTC's 58.76%. Bill Ackman would expect new product strategies to close the gap.
-487.74%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while INTC stands at 329.55%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-487.74%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while INTC is at 2.84%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-142.40%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while INTC stands at 91.23%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-48.71%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while INTC is at 168.08%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-48.71%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-87.00%
Negative 3Y CAGR while INTC is 396.59%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
791.18%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 307.72%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
791.18%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 12.18%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
77.06%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 14.89%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
20.01%
AR growth well above INTC's 6.88%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
13.71%
We show growth while INTC is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
1.56%
Positive asset growth while INTC is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
0.18%
Under 50% of INTC's 0.83%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-39.85%
We’re deleveraging while INTC stands at 9.04%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
9.86%
We increase R&D while INTC cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
7.77%
SG&A growth well above INTC's 6.34%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.