PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
13.05%
Revenue growth above 1.5x INTC's 7.90%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
19.02%
Gross profit growth 1.25-1.5x INTC's 14.32%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strategic sourcing or brand premium explains outperformance.
656.99%
EBIT growth above 1.5x INTC's 17.03%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
656.99%
Operating income growth above 1.5x INTC's 17.03%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
405.55%
Positive net income growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
333.33%
EPS growth of 333.33% while INTC is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can accelerate over time.
333.33%
Positive diluted EPS growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-0.13%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-2.61%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
101.50%
OCF growth above 1.5x INTC's 46.90%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
70.07%
FCF growth 50-75% of INTC's 94.82%. Martin Whitman would see if structural disadvantages exist in generating free cash.
276.85%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 180.15%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
276.85%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 26.44%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
20.73%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 67.89%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
-97.07%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while INTC stands at 673.75%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-97.07%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while INTC is at 60.66%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-98.07%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while INTC stands at 100.19%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
73.09%
Below 50% of INTC's 151.40%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
73.09%
Positive 5Y CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
-49.77%
Negative 3Y CAGR while INTC is 218.83%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
698.62%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 286.74%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
698.62%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 7.81%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
57.36%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 13.88%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
24.76%
AR growth well above INTC's 8.70%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
11.45%
Inventory growth well above INTC's 2.77%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
3.97%
Asset growth above 1.5x INTC's 1.82%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
1.34%
Positive BV/share change while INTC is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-33.27%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
2.88%
R&D dropping or stable vs. INTC's 14.03%. David Dodd sees near-term margin benefits if the product pipeline is already strong.
-1.51%
We cut SG&A while INTC invests at 10.13%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.