PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
3.07%
Positive revenue growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
8.43%
Positive gross profit growth while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
33.29%
Positive EBIT growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
33.29%
Positive operating income growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
34.23%
Positive net income growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
39.13%
Positive EPS growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
30.43%
Positive diluted EPS growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-4.97%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
1.70%
Slight or no buyback while INTC is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.67%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-6.30%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
470.73%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 131.51%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
195.45%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 53.72%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
-10.51%
Negative 3Y CAGR while INTC stands at 48.30%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
1728.60%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 59.03%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
533.44%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 103.76%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
64.10%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 37.27%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
609.96%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 82.54% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
164.79%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 221.23%. Martin Whitman might see a shortfall in operational efficiency or brand power.
-30.83%
Negative 3Y CAGR while INTC is 66.09%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
1013.55%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 220.28%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
469.21%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 6.85%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
26.58%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 8.69%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-13.85%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-2.46%
Inventory is declining while INTC stands at 14.11%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
0.40%
Positive asset growth while INTC is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
9.90%
Positive BV/share change while INTC is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
902.10%
We have some new debt while INTC reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
2.21%
R&D dropping or stable vs. INTC's 14.68%. David Dodd sees near-term margin benefits if the product pipeline is already strong.
-8.64%
We cut SG&A while INTC invests at 2.37%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.