PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.50%
Revenue growth under 50% of INTC's 9.11%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
4.89%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x INTC's 2.95%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
-10.62%
Negative EBIT growth while INTC is at 28.17%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-10.62%
Negative operating income growth while INTC is at 28.17%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-12.81%
Negative net income growth while INTC stands at 47.01%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-13.51%
Negative EPS growth while INTC is at 53.33%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-9.09%
Negative diluted EPS growth while INTC is at 46.67%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.65%
Slight or no buybacks while INTC is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
1.38%
Slight or no buyback while INTC is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
77.62%
Similar OCF growth to INTC's 82.11%. Walter Schloss would assume comparable operations or industry factors.
288.91%
FCF growth under 50% of INTC's 887.86%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
316.39%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 108.58%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
128.44%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 55.49%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
22.26%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of INTC's 26.03%. Bill Ackman would expect new product strategies to close the gap.
454.49%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 105.77%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
269.07%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 57.79%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
-16.91%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
326.17%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 21.70% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
80.39%
Below 50% of INTC's 1329.26%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
220.98%
Positive short-term CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
849.40%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 187.19%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
189.67%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 13.58%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
38.39%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 5.88%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.03%
Firm’s AR is declining while INTC shows 5.66%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-5.35%
Inventory is declining while INTC stands at 3.35%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
4.47%
Asset growth above 1.5x INTC's 1.66%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
5.14%
BV/share growth above 1.5x INTC's 1.19%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.47%
We increase R&D while INTC cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
5.52%
We expand SG&A while INTC cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.