PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
7.61%
Positive revenue growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
13.26%
Positive gross profit growth while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
-10.38%
Negative EBIT growth while INTC is at 12.57%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-10.38%
Negative operating income growth while INTC is at 12.57%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-7.52%
Negative net income growth while INTC stands at 8.99%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-2.27%
Negative EPS growth while INTC is at 7.69%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-13.64%
Negative diluted EPS growth while INTC is at 7.69%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-6.44%
Share reduction while INTC is at 0.23%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
4.98%
Diluted share count expanding well above INTC's 0.12%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-77.64%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-85.28%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
546.10%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 55.70%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
125.41%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 51.04%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
53.50%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 22.72%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
897.28%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
12.51%
5Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 17.52%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags in monetizing revenue effectively.
13.66%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
868.39%
Positive 10Y CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
179.23%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 102.23%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
318.68%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 6.07%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
1311.12%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 148.77%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
176.58%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 21.08%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
52.65%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 10.45%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
22.97%
AR growth well above INTC's 2.62%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
35.94%
Inventory growth well above INTC's 1.21%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
12.85%
Asset growth above 1.5x INTC's 0.80%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
17.94%
BV/share growth above 1.5x INTC's 1.88%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
32.42%
We increase R&D while INTC cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
30.91%
We expand SG&A while INTC cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.