PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.84%
Positive revenue growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
1.17%
Positive gross profit growth while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
-4.84%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-4.84%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-4.33%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-2.33%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-2.63%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.66%
Share count expansion well above INTC's 0.55%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
-1.22%
Reduced diluted shares while INTC is at 0.73%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-66.26%
Negative OCF growth while INTC is at 55.73%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-110.46%
Negative FCF growth while INTC is at 496.34%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
461.77%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 63.96%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
113.91%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 57.89%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
36.69%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 19.72%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
428.36%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 42.39%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
-76.31%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while INTC is at 64.49%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-17.39%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
725.23%
Positive 10Y CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
109.22%
Below 50% of INTC's 229.36%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
228.36%
Positive short-term CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
1178.18%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 156.77%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
153.95%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 28.25%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
51.87%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 14.20%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
17.47%
Our AR growth while INTC is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
9.32%
We show growth while INTC is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
1.04%
Asset growth well under 50% of INTC's 3.15%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
2.18%
Under 50% of INTC's 5.21%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.96%
We increase R&D while INTC cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
5.16%
SG&A growth well above INTC's 0.55%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.