PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
7.10%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x INTC's 6.16%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if differentiation or pricing power justifies outperformance.
15.50%
Gross profit growth at 75-90% of INTC's 20.40%. Bill Ackman would demand operational improvements to match competitor gains.
17.77%
EBIT growth below 50% of INTC's 42.12%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
17.77%
Operating income growth under 50% of INTC's 42.12%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
53.51%
Net income growth above 1.5x INTC's 26.80%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
36.00%
EPS growth 1.25-1.5x INTC's 25.81%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if strategic initiatives like cost cutting or better capital management explain the difference.
51.11%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x INTC's 30.00%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
8.15%
Share count expansion well above INTC's 0.05%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
2.06%
Diluted share count expanding well above INTC's 0.35%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-20.37%
Negative OCF growth while INTC is at 22.86%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-40.62%
Negative FCF growth while INTC is at 25.14%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
439.39%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 101.16%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
64.09%
5Y revenue/share CAGR similar to INTC's 69.00%. Walter Schloss might see both companies benefiting from the same mid-term trends.
57.73%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 20.30%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
3325.64%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 67.80%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
350.56%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 53.10%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
20671.08%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 25.00%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
782.52%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 59.21% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
108.79%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 75-90% of INTC's 144.55%. Bill Ackman would advocate improvements to match competitor’s profit expansion.
473.30%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 15.31%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
1169.28%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 170.80%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
144.32%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 36.19%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
61.77%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 19.48%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
18.08%
Our AR growth while INTC is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
-5.05%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
5.69%
Asset growth 1.25-1.5x INTC's 4.92%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's investments effectively outpace the competitor in future returns.
0.54%
Under 50% of INTC's 4.49%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-100.00%
We’re deleveraging while INTC stands at 6.63%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
15.31%
We increase R&D while INTC cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
12.33%
SG&A growth well above INTC's 6.10%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.