PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-3.94%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-1.44%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
1.97%
Positive EBIT growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
1.97%
Positive operating income growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-19.11%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-11.76%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-19.12%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-5.34%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-0.03%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
33.03%
Positive OCF growth while INTC is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
73.79%
Positive FCF growth while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
671.48%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 82.78%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
20.97%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 62.32%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
63.79%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 10.05%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
5748.32%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 21.39%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
424.82%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 46.74%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
356.35%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
1262.01%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 28.53% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
32.70%
Below 50% of INTC's 78.66%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
467.16%
Positive short-term CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
1672.84%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 113.60%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
101.52%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 30.12%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
76.67%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 15.72%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.09%
Firm’s AR is declining while INTC shows 5.78%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-6.22%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
4.70%
Positive asset growth while INTC is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
10.33%
Positive BV/share change while INTC is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.44%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
-5.12%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.