176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
19.28%
Revenue growth above 1.5x INTC's 7.89%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
21.59%
Gross profit growth 1.25-1.5x INTC's 14.67%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strategic sourcing or brand premium explains outperformance.
34.14%
EBIT growth similar to INTC's 37.38%. Walter Schloss might infer both firms share similar operational efficiencies.
34.14%
Operating income growth similar to INTC's 37.38%. Walter Schloss would assume both share comparable operational structures.
36.43%
Net income growth 1.25-1.5x INTC's 25.80%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strategic cost cutting or product mix explains this difference.
41.03%
EPS growth 1.25-1.5x INTC's 28.57%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if strategic initiatives like cost cutting or better capital management explain the difference.
31.94%
Diluted EPS growth 1.25-1.5x INTC's 25.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if strategic moves (e.g., targeted acquisitions, cost cuts) explain the edge.
1.40%
Slight or no buybacks while INTC is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
1.52%
Slight or no buyback while INTC is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
14.80%
Similar OCF growth to INTC's 16.23%. Walter Schloss would assume comparable operations or industry factors.
9.76%
FCF growth under 50% of INTC's 822.79%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
631.87%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 81.78%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
114.89%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 51.71%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
94.21%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 10.98%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
2203.77%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 31.74%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
245.23%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 19.92%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
78514.32%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
1314.76%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 54.71% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
501.62%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 41.37%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
717.34%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 9.22%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
1502.49%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 113.77%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
133.59%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 21.14%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
100.66%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 14.79%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.65%
AR growth well above INTC's 14.09%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
10.80%
Inventory growth well above INTC's 4.07%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
14.46%
Asset growth above 1.5x INTC's 0.62%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
8.12%
Positive BV/share change while INTC is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
13.66%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. INTC's 0.20%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
8.49%
We expand SG&A while INTC cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.