PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
7.81%
Positive revenue growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
6.60%
Positive gross profit growth while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
5.91%
Positive EBIT growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
5.91%
Positive operating income growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
9.05%
Positive net income growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
9.09%
Positive EPS growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
26.32%
Positive diluted EPS growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.46%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-33.58%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-44.88%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
660.55%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 36.62%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
132.27%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 10.14%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
103.68%
Positive 3Y CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
3767.77%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
83.91%
Positive OCF/share growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
144.23%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
1329.20%
Positive 10Y CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
356.93%
Positive 5Y CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
413.54%
Positive short-term CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
1605.93%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 111.44%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
154.20%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 20.88%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
113.15%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 16.63%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
20.65%
Our AR growth while INTC is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
17.11%
Inventory growth well above INTC's 10.18%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
7.84%
Positive asset growth while INTC is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
5.65%
BV/share growth above 1.5x INTC's 1.16%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.08%
We increase R&D while INTC cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
3.49%
We expand SG&A while INTC cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.