PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-4.10%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-6.32%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-22.67%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-22.67%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-31.20%
Negative net income growth while INTC stands at 176.50%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-33.33%
Negative EPS growth while INTC is at 200.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-37.50%
Negative diluted EPS growth while INTC is at 175.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.13%
Share count expansion well above INTC's 0.16%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
6.67%
Diluted share count expanding well above INTC's 0.20%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-42.47%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-131.26%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
926.57%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 19.99%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
143.90%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 2.68%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
79.87%
Positive 3Y CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
2599.56%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
207.67%
Positive OCF/share growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
47.63%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
1673.48%
Positive 10Y CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
666.76%
Positive 5Y CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
149.80%
Positive short-term CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
2155.17%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 88.55%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
143.96%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 19.24%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
102.52%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 19.48%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.20%
Firm’s AR is declining while INTC shows 21.85%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
17.18%
We show growth while INTC is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
1.60%
Positive asset growth while INTC is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
4.42%
Positive BV/share change while INTC is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.74%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. INTC's 0.08%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
1.94%
We expand SG&A while INTC cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.