PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-22.60%
Negative revenue growth while INTC stands at 12.30%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-70.88%
Negative gross profit growth while INTC is at 25.08%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-176.56%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-176.56%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-168.40%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-167.50%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-172.00%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-0.05%
Share reduction while INTC is at 0.39%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-6.18%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-44.26%
Negative OCF growth while INTC is at 795.24%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
148.21%
FCF growth under 50% of INTC's 312.47%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
589.93%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 40.74%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
67.87%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 14.91%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
41.71%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 3.88%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
1578.93%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 177.67%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
272.05%
Positive OCF/share growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
56.03%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 129.02%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
-1188.09%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-532.96%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-247.45%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
1845.86%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 81.38%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
131.20%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 16.62%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
90.55%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 16.35%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.24%
Our AR growth while INTC is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
2.89%
We show growth while INTC is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
4.01%
Asset growth above 1.5x INTC's 1.32%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
-2.67%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.71%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
-0.68%
We cut SG&A while INTC invests at 124.75%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.