PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
38.05%
Positive revenue growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
33.90%
Positive gross profit growth while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
-31.92%
Negative EBIT growth while INTC is at 38.09%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-31.92%
Negative operating income growth while INTC is at 38.09%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-36.35%
Negative net income growth while INTC stands at 7.01%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-34.78%
Negative EPS growth while INTC is at 4.76%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-36.76%
Negative diluted EPS growth while INTC is at 7.50%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.87%
Share count expansion well above INTC's 0.09%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
-0.28%
Reduced diluted shares while INTC is at 0.55%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
816.19%
OCF growth above 1.5x INTC's 19.79%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
293.17%
FCF growth above 1.5x INTC's 35.59%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
505.77%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 55.72%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
28.61%
5Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x INTC's 22.63%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if cost efficiency or pricing power supports this advantage.
-6.24%
Negative 3Y CAGR while INTC stands at 21.57%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
2606.74%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 50.25%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
111.21%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 22.00%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
171.41%
3Y OCF/share CAGR similar to INTC's 174.61%. Walter Schloss might see both benefiting from a rising tide or parallel expansions.
-2169.33%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while INTC is at 9.47%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-961.70%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while INTC is 25.95%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-313.69%
Negative 3Y CAGR while INTC is 55.96%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
1857.62%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 43.61%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
95.08%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 27.79%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
38.73%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 19.45%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.41%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-39.15%
Inventory is declining while INTC stands at 1.74%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-5.13%
Negative asset growth while INTC invests at 5.04%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-4.00%
We have a declining book value while INTC shows 2.77%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-1.10%
We’re deleveraging while INTC stands at 7.25%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
42.51%
We increase R&D while INTC cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
37.51%
We expand SG&A while INTC cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.