PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
8.78%
Revenue growth above 1.5x INTC's 3.20%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
11.98%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x INTC's 1.16%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
24.51%
Positive EBIT growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
24.51%
Positive operating income growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
21.84%
Net income growth above 1.5x INTC's 7.61%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
14.00%
EPS growth above 1.5x INTC's 7.55%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
18.75%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x INTC's 7.69%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
1.23%
Slight or no buybacks while INTC is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
0.00%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x INTC's 0.09%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-51.00%
Negative OCF growth while INTC is at 55.16%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-62.58%
Negative FCF growth while INTC is at 66.19%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
517.81%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 59.57%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
65.46%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 21.52%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
14.54%
3Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x INTC's 12.50%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better product or regional expansions than the competitor.
954.88%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 99.12%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
-33.39%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while INTC is at 61.03%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-69.21%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while INTC stands at 22.34%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
624.87%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 75.74% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
160.46%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 40.26%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
-17.86%
Negative 3Y CAGR while INTC is 47.29%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
1627.00%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 60.51%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
115.78%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 47.81%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
36.06%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 21.59%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.75%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
19.10%
Inventory growth well above INTC's 9.76%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
3.53%
Asset growth at 75-90% of INTC's 4.29%. Bill Ackman suggests reviewing opportunities to match or surpass the competitor's asset expansion if profitable.
8.62%
BV/share growth above 1.5x INTC's 4.06%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-1.25%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
9.25%
We increase R&D while INTC cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
2.56%
SG&A declining or stable vs. INTC's 13.21%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.