PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
4.03%
Positive revenue growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
191.95%
Positive gross profit growth while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
159.23%
Positive EBIT growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
159.23%
Positive operating income growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
160.20%
Positive net income growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
161.29%
Positive EPS growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
161.29%
Positive diluted EPS growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.80%
Slight or no buybacks while INTC is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
1.73%
Slight or no buyback while INTC is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
517.80%
OCF growth above 1.5x INTC's 59.88%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
5868.30%
FCF growth above 1.5x INTC's 144.52%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
191.98%
Similar 10Y revenue/share CAGR to INTC's 181.27%. Walter Schloss might see both firms benefiting from the same long-term demand.
27.81%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 80.90%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
-27.28%
Negative 3Y CAGR while INTC stands at 50.28%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
722.75%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 298.83%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
122.93%
5Y OCF/share CAGR at 75-90% of INTC's 152.75%. Bill Ackman would push for operational improvements to match competitor’s mid-term gains.
-46.34%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while INTC stands at 108.36%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
107.29%
Below 50% of INTC's 4131.66%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
14.91%
Below 50% of INTC's 196.07%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
-65.38%
Negative 3Y CAGR while INTC is 85.75%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
449.65%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 66.14%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
89.75%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 46.28%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
12.42%
Below 50% of INTC's 27.85%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.90%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. INTC's 13.75%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
-12.99%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
4.94%
Asset growth at 50-75% of INTC's 6.75%. Martin Whitman questions if the firm is lagging expansions or if the competitor invests more aggressively.
4.15%
Positive BV/share change while INTC is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-1.58%
We’re deleveraging while INTC stands at 230.50%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
-2.90%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
-15.29%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.