176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
4.89%
Positive revenue growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
5.98%
Positive gross profit growth while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
13.25%
EBIT growth above 1.5x INTC's 0.23%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
13.25%
Operating income growth above 1.5x INTC's 0.23%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
17.62%
Net income growth above 1.5x INTC's 5.13%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
15.87%
EPS growth above 1.5x INTC's 5.36%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
15.87%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x INTC's 7.41%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
0.95%
Slight or no buybacks while INTC is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
-0.06%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
197.99%
OCF growth above 1.5x INTC's 8.61%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
249.90%
Positive FCF growth while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
104.85%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 175.24%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm’s offerings lag behind the competitor.
13.16%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 55.82%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
6.40%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 58.85%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
793.32%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 186.36%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
-26.42%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while INTC is at 54.83%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
409.15%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 42.50%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
183.95%
Below 50% of INTC's 476.32%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
45.78%
Below 50% of INTC's 93.87%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
158.63%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 77.47%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
362.88%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 85.63%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
87.50%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 40.73%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
43.12%
3Y equity/share CAGR similar to INTC's 39.89%. Walter Schloss sees both having parallel profitability or reinvestment over 3 years.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.59%
Firm’s AR is declining while INTC shows 11.12%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-11.69%
Inventory is declining while INTC stands at 8.46%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
3.57%
Asset growth 1.25-1.5x INTC's 2.89%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's investments effectively outpace the competitor in future returns.
6.68%
BV/share growth above 1.5x INTC's 1.53%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-2.42%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
3.54%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. INTC's 3.66%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
-0.39%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.