PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-10.60%
Negative revenue growth while INTC stands at 0.15%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-11.98%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-37.94%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-37.94%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-34.92%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-34.25%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-34.25%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.72%
Slight or no buybacks while INTC is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
0.82%
Slight or no buyback while INTC is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
67.96%
OCF growth above 1.5x INTC's 17.08%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
77.88%
FCF growth 75-90% of INTC's 93.04%. Bill Ackman might push for improved capital allocation or operational changes to match the competitor.
66.43%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 149.95%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
1.43%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 47.90%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
74.20%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 41.79%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
650.77%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 127.26%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
66.63%
5Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x INTC's 48.44%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if capital spending or working-capital efficiencies explain the difference.
1918.95%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 96.78%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
38.55%
Below 50% of INTC's 212.42%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
-33.64%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while INTC is 27.75%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
169.09%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 20.25%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
371.99%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 91.70%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
93.18%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 40.76%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
52.23%
3Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x INTC's 36.52%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms timely buybacks or margin improvements drive stronger near-term equity growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.46%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
6.48%
We show growth while INTC is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
9.12%
Asset growth at 50-75% of INTC's 13.31%. Martin Whitman questions if the firm is lagging expansions or if the competitor invests more aggressively.
3.59%
75-90% of INTC's 4.51%. Bill Ackman advocates improvements in profitability or buybacks to keep pace in net worth growth.
-2.32%
We’re deleveraging while INTC stands at 87.93%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
4.04%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. INTC's 0.92%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
-2.23%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.