PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-2.97%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-5.44%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-40.46%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-40.46%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-47.91%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-47.92%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-47.92%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.71%
Slight or no buybacks while INTC is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
0.84%
Slight or no buyback while INTC is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-102.24%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-110.44%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
16.48%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 146.90%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
-3.71%
Negative 5Y CAGR while INTC stands at 52.10%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
22.63%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 36.49%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags behind competitor innovations.
-113.86%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while INTC stands at 232.02%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-102.64%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while INTC is at 126.26%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-105.71%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while INTC stands at 17.39%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-46.70%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while INTC is at 196.13%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-59.84%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while INTC is 65.75%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
126.44%
Positive short-term CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
262.34%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 91.61%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
79.80%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 47.26%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
62.83%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 33.35%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
22.32%
Our AR growth while INTC is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
0.71%
We show growth while INTC is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
2.80%
Positive asset growth while INTC is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
2.69%
BV/share growth above 1.5x INTC's 0.39%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-2.84%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
6.39%
We increase R&D while INTC cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
5.75%
We expand SG&A while INTC cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.