PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-13.75%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-11.45%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-54.91%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-54.91%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-55.23%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-52.86%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-52.86%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-0.53%
Share reduction while INTC is at 0.06%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.44%
Reduced diluted shares while INTC is at 0.27%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
-0.75%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
-61.05%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-72.73%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
81.86%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of INTC's 105.52%. Bill Ackman would press for new markets or product lines to narrow the gap.
-25.44%
Negative 5Y CAGR while INTC stands at 100.16%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-12.38%
Negative 3Y CAGR while INTC stands at 8.90%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
235.16%
10Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x INTC's 157.83%. Bruce Berkowitz would confirm if the firm's long-term capital allocation yields better cash returns.
8.94%
Below 50% of INTC's 937.73%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
3092.43%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
204.28%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 46.62% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
-60.32%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while INTC is 237.17%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-47.95%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
287.32%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 98.46%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
58.76%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of INTC's 66.44%. Bill Ackman might push for an improved ROE or share repurchase strategy to keep up.
55.06%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 34.39%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-23.61%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-10.03%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-2.07%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
0.46%
Positive BV/share change while INTC is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-3.50%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
9.78%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. INTC's 0.71%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
4.43%
SG&A growth well above INTC's 1.55%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.