PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
2.36%
Revenue growth under 50% of INTC's 8.36%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
5.20%
Gross profit growth under 50% of INTC's 16.93%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
27.49%
EBIT growth 50-75% of INTC's 51.76%. Martin Whitman would suspect suboptimal resource allocation.
27.49%
Operating income growth at 50-75% of INTC's 51.76%. Martin Whitman would doubt the firm’s ability to compete efficiently.
23.82%
Net income growth at 50-75% of INTC's 43.61%. Martin Whitman would question fundamental disadvantages in expenses or demand.
21.21%
EPS growth under 50% of INTC's 43.59%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
21.21%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of INTC's 44.74%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
-5.11%
Share reduction while INTC is at 0.14%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-4.41%
Reduced diluted shares while INTC is at 0.12%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
-1.27%
Dividend reduction while INTC stands at 0.48%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-45.08%
Negative OCF growth while INTC is at 55.76%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-89.56%
Negative FCF growth while INTC is at 223.28%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
74.38%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 122.48%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm’s offerings lag behind the competitor.
3.88%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 93.62%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
17.88%
Positive 3Y CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
320.67%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 73.68%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
13.07%
Below 50% of INTC's 81.00%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
174.85%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 48.21%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
227.65%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 106.04% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
175.68%
Below 50% of INTC's 889.11%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
166.95%
Positive short-term CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
243.72%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 98.76%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
48.67%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 70.44%. Martin Whitman would question a shortfall in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
47.89%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 31.24%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
20.50%
Our AR growth while INTC is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
0.18%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. INTC's 4.78%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
-11.31%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-8.86%
We have a declining book value while INTC shows 1.91%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-3.53%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
1.40%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. INTC's 0.46%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
-0.33%
We cut SG&A while INTC invests at 1.18%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.