PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
7.85%
Revenue growth above 1.5x INTC's 5.23%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
7.13%
Gross profit growth 1.25-1.5x INTC's 6.07%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strategic sourcing or brand premium explains outperformance.
33.59%
EBIT growth above 1.5x INTC's 18.11%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
33.59%
Operating income growth above 1.5x INTC's 18.11%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
23.11%
Net income growth 1.25-1.5x INTC's 18.63%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strategic cost cutting or product mix explains this difference.
25.00%
EPS growth 1.25-1.5x INTC's 21.43%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if strategic initiatives like cost cutting or better capital management explain the difference.
25.00%
Diluted EPS growth 1.25-1.5x INTC's 20.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if strategic moves (e.g., targeted acquisitions, cost cuts) explain the edge.
-0.76%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-0.55%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
0.90%
Maintaining or increasing dividends while INTC cut them. John Neff might see a strong edge in shareholder returns.
68.26%
OCF growth above 1.5x INTC's 4.40%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
981.22%
FCF growth above 1.5x INTC's 23.73%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
80.86%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 124.44%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm’s offerings lag behind the competitor.
9.92%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of INTC's 75.88%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
24.13%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 8.83%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
1671.53%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 134.61%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
253.37%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 61.37%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
-23.97%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
1458.15%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 127.34% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
80.02%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 75-90% of INTC's 102.78%. Bill Ackman would advocate improvements to match competitor’s profit expansion.
39.06%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 1.80%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
256.93%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 94.91%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
62.64%
5Y equity/share CAGR is in line with INTC's 65.66%. Walter Schloss would see parallel mid-term profitability and retention policies.
48.19%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 31.52%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.06%
AR growth well above INTC's 4.53%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
0.54%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. INTC's 4.36%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
2.55%
Positive asset growth while INTC is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
4.36%
Positive BV/share change while INTC is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-3.79%
We’re deleveraging while INTC stands at 0.55%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
2.58%
We increase R&D while INTC cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
-4.74%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.