PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-3.62%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-2.43%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-7.22%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-7.22%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-7.08%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-7.69%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-4.76%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-1.65%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-1.20%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
-1.68%
Dividend reduction while INTC stands at 6.99%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-62.31%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-63.52%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
107.11%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x INTC's 77.48%. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate brand strength or geographical expansion fueling growth.
61.04%
5Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x INTC's 44.73%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if cost efficiency or pricing power supports this advantage.
21.95%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 4.42%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
117.69%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 53.99%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
3.07%
Below 50% of INTC's 26.23%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
-6.70%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while INTC stands at 56.64%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
466.73%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 19.82% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
165.77%
Positive 5Y CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
7.41%
Positive short-term CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
240.03%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 90.80%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
74.30%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 49.31%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
28.58%
3Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x INTC's 23.85%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms timely buybacks or margin improvements drive stronger near-term equity growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7.02%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
1.42%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. INTC's 3.39%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
-5.33%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-4.92%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
0.44%
We have some new debt while INTC reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
-0.71%
Our R&D shrinks while INTC invests at 0.17%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
2.51%
We expand SG&A while INTC cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.