PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.00%
Revenue growth under 50% of INTC's 3.24%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
2.44%
Gross profit growth under 50% of INTC's 6.70%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
7.81%
EBIT growth 50-75% of INTC's 10.75%. Martin Whitman would suspect suboptimal resource allocation.
7.81%
Operating income growth at 50-75% of INTC's 10.75%. Martin Whitman would doubt the firm’s ability to compete efficiently.
-6.26%
Negative net income growth while INTC stands at 35.84%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-3.33%
Negative EPS growth while INTC is at 35.71%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-8.33%
Negative diluted EPS growth while INTC is at 34.15%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-0.16%
Share reduction while INTC is at 0.38%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
0.03%
Slight or no buyback while INTC is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
1.66%
Dividend growth above 1.5x INTC's 0.41%. David Dodd would verify if the firm's cash flow is robust enough for these payouts.
-36.25%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-39.52%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
116.05%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x INTC's 84.54%. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate brand strength or geographical expansion fueling growth.
39.07%
5Y revenue/share CAGR similar to INTC's 43.28%. Walter Schloss might see both companies benefiting from the same mid-term trends.
16.87%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 3.13%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
397.76%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 49.43%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
-30.22%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while INTC is at 15.35%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
26.45%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
2133.69%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 71.42% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
219.01%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 9.57%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
-9.05%
Negative 3Y CAGR while INTC is 1.01%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
251.20%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 98.03%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
87.57%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 47.12%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
25.69%
3Y equity/share CAGR similar to INTC's 24.81%. Walter Schloss sees both having parallel profitability or reinvestment over 3 years.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
18.46%
AR growth well above INTC's 18.92%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
-1.49%
Inventory is declining while INTC stands at 9.05%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
1.01%
Similar asset growth to INTC's 1.03%. Walter Schloss finds parallel expansions or investment rates.
3.47%
50-75% of INTC's 4.65%. Martin Whitman suspects weaker earnings or capital allocation vs. the competitor.
0.44%
Debt growth far above INTC's 0.01%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
0.86%
R&D dropping or stable vs. INTC's 3.07%. David Dodd sees near-term margin benefits if the product pipeline is already strong.
0.08%
We expand SG&A while INTC cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.