PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
11.11%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x INTC's 9.62%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if differentiation or pricing power justifies outperformance.
9.33%
Gross profit growth at 75-90% of INTC's 10.46%. Bill Ackman would demand operational improvements to match competitor gains.
30.72%
EBIT growth 50-75% of INTC's 44.75%. Martin Whitman would suspect suboptimal resource allocation.
30.72%
Operating income growth at 50-75% of INTC's 44.75%. Martin Whitman would doubt the firm’s ability to compete efficiently.
35.16%
Net income growth above 1.5x INTC's 14.89%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
37.93%
EPS growth above 1.5x INTC's 14.04%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
41.82%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x INTC's 16.36%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
-1.87%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-2.17%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
-1.02%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
123.95%
OCF growth above 1.5x INTC's 66.72%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
138.47%
FCF growth 75-90% of INTC's 170.71%. Bill Ackman might push for improved capital allocation or operational changes to match the competitor.
116.11%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x INTC's 85.46%. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate brand strength or geographical expansion fueling growth.
36.54%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 53.02%. Martin Whitman would worry about a lagging mid-term growth trajectory.
27.37%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 13.13%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
45077.62%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 67.74%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
53.55%
5Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 88.30%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags in monetizing revenue effectively.
-2.23%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while INTC stands at 17.27%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
507.76%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 99.01% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
61.81%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 23.56%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
7.52%
3Y net income/share CAGR 50-75% of INTC's 10.10%. Martin Whitman might see a lagging edge in short-term profitability vs. the competitor.
244.94%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 98.81%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
74.59%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 40.59%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
17.27%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of INTC's 21.97%. Bill Ackman pushes for margin or operational changes to match the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
19.97%
AR growth well above INTC's 6.24%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
5.33%
Inventory growth well above INTC's 3.05%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
-0.69%
Negative asset growth while INTC invests at 8.91%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-0.47%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
0.44%
Debt shrinking faster vs. INTC's 60.10%. David Dodd sees a safer balance sheet if it doesn't impair future growth.
0.88%
We increase R&D while INTC cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
3.90%
We expand SG&A while INTC cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.