PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
2.05%
Revenue growth at 50-75% of INTC's 3.10%. Martin Whitman would worry about competitiveness or product relevance.
3.38%
Gross profit growth at 50-75% of INTC's 5.26%. Martin Whitman would question if cost structure or brand is lagging.
8.35%
EBIT growth above 1.5x INTC's 2.55%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
8.35%
Operating income growth above 1.5x INTC's 2.55%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
11.66%
Net income growth at 50-75% of INTC's 16.21%. Martin Whitman would question fundamental disadvantages in expenses or demand.
10.00%
EPS growth at 50-75% of INTC's 18.46%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lag in operational efficiency or a higher share count.
12.82%
Diluted EPS growth at 75-90% of INTC's 15.62%. Bill Ackman would expect further improvements in net income or share count reduction.
-0.66%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-0.29%
Reduced diluted shares while INTC is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
0.98%
Maintaining or increasing dividends while INTC cut them. John Neff might see a strong edge in shareholder returns.
105.33%
Positive OCF growth while INTC is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
134.07%
Positive FCF growth while INTC is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
115.98%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x INTC's 85.99%. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate brand strength or geographical expansion fueling growth.
30.54%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 53.05%. Martin Whitman would worry about a lagging mid-term growth trajectory.
47.41%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 16.43%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
336.77%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 85.14%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
555.72%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 14.97%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
21.18%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
293.57%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 87.37% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
51.11%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 33.59%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
87.03%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 54.02%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
266.85%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 114.77%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
70.01%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 45.30%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
19.74%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of INTC's 25.51%. Bill Ackman pushes for margin or operational changes to match the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-15.87%
Firm’s AR is declining while INTC shows 16.73%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
18.33%
Inventory growth well above INTC's 4.07%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
4.58%
Similar asset growth to INTC's 4.58%. Walter Schloss finds parallel expansions or investment rates.
5.77%
75-90% of INTC's 7.55%. Bill Ackman advocates improvements in profitability or buybacks to keep pace in net worth growth.
0.44%
Debt shrinking faster vs. INTC's 6.99%. David Dodd sees a safer balance sheet if it doesn't impair future growth.
2.40%
R&D dropping or stable vs. INTC's 6.56%. David Dodd sees near-term margin benefits if the product pipeline is already strong.
-2.50%
We cut SG&A while INTC invests at 10.89%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.