PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-7.96%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-6.66%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-23.85%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-23.85%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-30.62%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-31.82%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-31.82%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.89%
Share change of 0.89% while INTC is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
2.05%
Slight or no buyback while INTC is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
-1.35%
Dividend reduction while INTC stands at 8.38%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-44.44%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-47.53%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
81.68%
Similar 10Y revenue/share CAGR to INTC's 90.01%. Walter Schloss might see both firms benefiting from the same long-term demand.
18.70%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of INTC's 23.14%. Bill Ackman would encourage strategies to match competitor’s pace.
39.59%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 14.13%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
153.08%
10Y OCF/share CAGR in line with INTC's 139.84%. Walter Schloss would see both as similarly efficient over the decade.
4809.05%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 16.67%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
3096.56%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
91.62%
Similar net income/share CAGR to INTC's 86.92%. Walter Schloss would see parallel tailwinds or expansions for both firms.
0.61%
Positive 5Y CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
148.69%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 4.84%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
241.19%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 120.73%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
64.54%
5Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x INTC's 49.17%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms if reinvested profits or buybacks explain the superior buildup.
19.19%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of INTC's 25.21%. Bill Ackman pushes for margin or operational changes to match the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.01%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-9.30%
Inventory is declining while INTC stands at 11.30%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
1.24%
Asset growth at 50-75% of INTC's 2.33%. Martin Whitman questions if the firm is lagging expansions or if the competitor invests more aggressively.
2.22%
BV/share growth above 1.5x INTC's 0.15%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
0.40%
Debt shrinking faster vs. INTC's 11.91%. David Dodd sees a safer balance sheet if it doesn't impair future growth.
-2.66%
Our R&D shrinks while INTC invests at 4.07%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
14.80%
SG&A growth well above INTC's 5.10%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.