PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.17%
Positive revenue growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
-2.91%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-56.82%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-56.82%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-80.60%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-78.33%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-78.33%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-1.46%
Share reduction while INTC is at 0.15%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-2.11%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
16.92%
Dividend growth above 1.5x INTC's 0.26%. David Dodd would verify if the firm's cash flow is robust enough for these payouts.
-33.74%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-35.65%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
87.92%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of INTC's 107.28%. Bill Ackman would press for new markets or product lines to narrow the gap.
50.48%
Positive 5Y CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
26.33%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 11.20%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
222.52%
10Y OCF/share CAGR in line with INTC's 207.87%. Walter Schloss would see both as similarly efficient over the decade.
402.48%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 10.07%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
-7.16%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-67.45%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while INTC is at 84.35%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
119.53%
Positive 5Y CAGR while INTC is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
-75.01%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
207.45%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 116.34%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
60.50%
5Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x INTC's 43.18%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms if reinvested profits or buybacks explain the superior buildup.
7.51%
Below 50% of INTC's 19.98%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.97%
AR growth well above INTC's 4.98%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
0.68%
Inventory growth well above INTC's 0.85%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
-4.28%
Negative asset growth while INTC invests at 4.14%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-6.78%
We have a declining book value while INTC shows 0.17%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
0.50%
Debt shrinking faster vs. INTC's 12.79%. David Dodd sees a safer balance sheet if it doesn't impair future growth.
-5.60%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
7.97%
We expand SG&A while INTC cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.