PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
13.18%
Revenue growth at 75-90% of INTC's 16.59%. Bill Ackman would push for innovation or market expansion to catch up.
15.77%
Gross profit growth at 50-75% of INTC's 25.21%. Martin Whitman would question if cost structure or brand is lagging.
222.37%
EBIT growth similar to INTC's 238.54%. Walter Schloss might infer both firms share similar operational efficiencies.
222.37%
Operating income growth similar to INTC's 238.54%. Walter Schloss would assume both share comparable operational structures.
846.15%
Net income growth above 1.5x INTC's 153.98%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
746.15%
EPS growth above 1.5x INTC's 153.57%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
746.15%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x INTC's 155.56%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
0.18%
Share count expansion well above INTC's 0.11%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
1.62%
Diluted share count expanding well above INTC's 0.23%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
-0.18%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
56.44%
OCF growth 1.25-1.5x INTC's 49.75%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if superior pricing or efficient operations explain the gap.
71.22%
FCF growth 50-75% of INTC's 111.35%. Martin Whitman would see if structural disadvantages exist in generating free cash.
110.53%
Similar 10Y revenue/share CAGR to INTC's 120.02%. Walter Schloss might see both firms benefiting from the same long-term demand.
64.71%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 21.63%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
24.45%
3Y revenue/share CAGR similar to INTC's 23.13%. Walter Schloss would assume both companies experience comparable short-term cycles.
185.38%
10Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x INTC's 151.50%. Bruce Berkowitz would confirm if the firm's long-term capital allocation yields better cash returns.
28.02%
Positive OCF/share growth while INTC is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
61.34%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 5.71%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
254.82%
Net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x INTC's 216.41%. Bruce Berkowitz might see more effective use of capital or consistently better margins over time.
208.77%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 6.87%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
35.10%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 20.48%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
211.42%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 119.65%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
64.12%
5Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x INTC's 50.16%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms if reinvested profits or buybacks explain the superior buildup.
8.56%
Below 50% of INTC's 19.76%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.28%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. INTC's 11.88%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
-3.63%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
2.79%
Asset growth 1.25-1.5x INTC's 2.17%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's investments effectively outpace the competitor in future returns.
6.49%
BV/share growth above 1.5x INTC's 2.74%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
0.43%
We have some new debt while INTC reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
2.81%
We increase R&D while INTC cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
2.01%
We expand SG&A while INTC cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.