PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
176.45 - 178.59
86.62 - 184.48
124.91M / 173.95M (Avg.)
50.81 | 3.50
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
7.36%
Revenue growth above 1.5x INTC's 3.78%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
7.77%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x INTC's 1.22%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
2.86%
EBIT growth above 1.5x INTC's 1.43%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
2.86%
Operating income growth above 1.5x INTC's 1.43%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
-15.85%
Negative net income growth while INTC stands at 5.45%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-13.64%
Negative EPS growth while INTC is at 5.63%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-20.00%
Negative diluted EPS growth while INTC is at 5.80%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-0.55%
Share reduction while INTC is at 0.02%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
4.96%
Diluted share count expanding well above INTC's 0.08%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
15.73%
Dividend growth above 1.5x INTC's 0.14%. David Dodd would verify if the firm's cash flow is robust enough for these payouts.
100.39%
OCF growth above 1.5x INTC's 41.54%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
108.40%
FCF growth above 1.5x INTC's 40.21%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
128.82%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x INTC's 105.62%. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate brand strength or geographical expansion fueling growth.
71.09%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 26.33%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
45.63%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 24.26%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
134.63%
10Y OCF/share CAGR in line with INTC's 136.11%. Walter Schloss would see both as similarly efficient over the decade.
27.25%
5Y OCF/share CAGR at 75-90% of INTC's 31.70%. Bill Ackman would push for operational improvements to match competitor’s mid-term gains.
30.36%
3Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 41.71%. Martin Whitman would suspect weaker recent execution or product competitiveness.
118.48%
Net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of INTC's 188.88%. Martin Whitman might question if the firm’s product or cost base lags behind.
30.54%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 13.58%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
36.90%
3Y net income/share CAGR 75-90% of INTC's 42.46%. Bill Ackman might push for an operational plan to match or beat the competitor’s short-term growth.
217.26%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 119.36%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
52.05%
5Y equity/share CAGR is in line with INTC's 54.55%. Walter Schloss would see parallel mid-term profitability and retention policies.
6.51%
Below 50% of INTC's 19.35%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
49.76%
3Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x INTC's 15.47%. David Dodd sees a superior short-term capital return strategy if supported by stable earnings.
-5.78%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-1.65%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
2.73%
Asset growth above 1.5x INTC's 0.99%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
0.65%
Under 50% of INTC's 4.91%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
6.56%
We have some new debt while INTC reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
4.56%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. INTC's 6.88%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
5.92%
SG&A growth well above INTC's 7.58%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.